Home  | News

11.02.2025

Teaser image to Can AI Help Solve Complex Physics Equations? Meet APEBench

Can AI Help Solve Complex Physics Equations? Meet APEBench

MCML Research Insight - With Felix Köhler, Rüdiger Westermann and Nils Thuerey

Our Junior Member Felix Köhler, together with our PIs Rüdiger Westermann and Nils Thuerey, and collaborator Simon Niedermayr, have introduced APEBench, an innovative benchmark suite. APEBench sets a new standard for evaluating autoregressive neural emulators, which are designed to solve partial differential equations (PDEs)—the fundamental mathematical framework for modeling natural phenomena such as weather patterns, fluid dynamics, and chemical reactions.


«APEBench is a comprehensive benchmark suite to evaluate autoregressive neural emulators for solving partial differential equations (PDEs).»


Felix Köhler

MCML Junior Member

What is APEBench?

Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) are the backbone of many scientific fields, modeling everything from ocean currents to climate patterns. However, solving them accurately demands massive computational resources. Traditional numerical solvers provide precision but at a high cost, while AI-based alternatives offer speed but struggle with stability. To address this challenge, the authors introduce APEBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate and enhance AI-based PDE solvers.

APEBench is an open-source benchmark that evaluates neural emulators—AI models trained to approximate complex PDE solutions. Unlike traditional simulators, which compute every detail from first principles, emulators learn from data to make fast, step-by-step predictions. But how do we know if these AI models are reliable? That’s where APEBench’s key contributions come in.


«APEBench bridges the gap between neural emulators and classical solvers, enabling insights into long-term stability and performance.»


Felix Köhler

MCML Junior Member

Four Key Innovations of APEBench

1) A Large Selection of PDEs

APEBench includes 46 different PDE scenarios across 1D, 2D, and 3D, covering a wide range of real-world physics problems. This diversity allows researchers to compare AI models across simple and complex systems, ensuring that AI-driven solvers are tested under realistic conditions.

2) A Unique System for Identifying PDE Dynamics

Unlike previous benchmarks, APEBench provides a structured way to classify PDEs based on their mathematical properties. It introduces a unique identifier system that links each PDE to well-known stability criteria from classical numerical methods. This allows researchers to quantify the difficulty of solving a given PDE and compare how different AI models handle complex dynamics.

3) A Differentiable Simulation Suite

APEBench includes a JAX-based differentiable simulator, enabling AI models to interact directly with physics-based solvers during training. This means that instead of relying on precomputed datasets, models can be trained with real-time simulation feedback, improving their accuracy and adaptability. This feature is especially valuable for hybrid AI-solvers, which blend AI with traditional numerical techniques.

4) A New Approach to Evaluating Long-Term Accuracy

Traditional PDE benchmarks often focus on short-term performance, but in real-world applications, long-term stability is crucial. APEBench introduces rollout metrics, which track how well an AI model generalizes over extended simulations. By analyzing these metrics, researchers can identify which training methods lead to more stable and reliable AI solvers.


Examples of the 46 PDE dynamics

Examples of the 46 PDE dynamics

Why Does This Matter?

Neural emulators have the potential to dramatically accelerate PDE simulations, making applications like weather prediction, climate modeling, and engineering simulations more efficient. APEBench provides a structured and rigorous way to evaluate these AI-driven solvers, ensuring that they are not only fast but also accurate and stable over time.


Discover More

Want to see APEBench in action? Check out the animated visual summary on the APEBench Project Page.

APEBench Project

Felix Köhler also created a Quickstart Video to help you dive in—check it out on YouTube.

Quickstart Video

Explore the full paper, published at NeurIPS 2024, including its methodology, experiments, and future directions:

F. Köhler • S. Niedermayr • R. WestermannN. Thuerey
APEBench: A Benchmark for Autoregressive Neural Emulators of PDEs.
NeurIPS 2024 - 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Vancouver, Canada, Dec 10-15, 2024. URL GitHub
snapshot from the poster session at NeurIPS 2024

Behind the scenes: Snapshot from the poster session at NeurIPS 2024


Share Your Research!


Get in touch with us!

Are you an MCML Junior Member and interested in showcasing your research on our blog?

We’re happy to feature your work—get in touch with us to present your paper.

#blog #research #thuerey #westermann
Subscribe to RSS News feed

Related

Link to Research on human-centred Exosuit technology highlighted in Börsen-Zeitung

03.11.2025

Research on Human-Centred Exosuit Technology Highlighted in Börsen-Zeitung

Julian Rodemann worked with Harvard on interpretable algorithms for “Back Exosuits,” improving human–machine interaction.

Link to

02.11.2025

MCML at EMNLP 2025

MCML researchers are represented with 37 papers at EMNLP 2025 (17 Main, 13 Findings, and 7 Workshops).

Link to Language Shapes Gender Bias in AI Images

30.10.2025

Language Shapes Gender Bias in AI Images

Alexander Fraser shows AI image generators reproduce gender stereotypes differently across languages, highlighting the need for fair multilingual AI.

Link to Barbara Plank Featured on ARD

26.10.2025

Barbara Plank Featured on ARD

MCML PI Barbara Plank featured on ARD, highlighting AI challenges in understanding regional dialects.

Link to Unai Fischer-Abaigar Featured on Executive Code

26.10.2025

Unai Fischer-Abaigar Featured on Executive Code

MCML Junior Member Unai Fischer-Abaigar featured on Executive Code, exploring AI in government resource allocation and public program outcomes.

Back to Top