This thesis examines researcher degrees of freedom (RDF), the flexibility in data analysis that can lead to differing, sometimes biased, results. It introduces the minP permutation method as a more powerful alternative to traditional corrections for multiple testing and applies it in a neurosurgical study. Further, it develops approaches to address pleiotropy in Mendelian Randomisation, highlights the risks of selective interpretation in methodological research through the 'storytelling fallacy', and demonstrates these with real-world examples. Finally, it presents an educational seminar designed to raise student awareness of RDF and promote open science practices. (Shortened.)
BibTeXKey: Man25