Home | Publications | BHW23

On Second-Order Scoring Rules for Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification

MCML Authors

Viktor Bengs

Dr.

* Former Member

→ Group Eyke Hüllermeier
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Eyke Hüllermeier

Prof. Dr.

Principal Investigator

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Abstract

It is well known that accurate probabilistic predictors can be trained through empirical risk minimisation with proper scoring rules as loss functions. While such learners capture so-called aleatoric uncertainty of predictions, various machine learning methods have recently been developed with the goal to let the learner also represent its epistemic uncertainty, i.e., the uncertainty caused by a lack of knowledge and data. An emerging branch of the literature proposes the use of a second-order learner that provides predictions in terms of distributions on probability distributions. However, recent work has revealed serious theoretical shortcomings for second-order predictors based on loss minimisation. In this paper, we generalise these findings and prove a more fundamental result: There seems to be no loss function that provides an incentive for a second-order learner to faithfully represent its epistemic uncertainty in the same manner as proper scoring rules do for standard (first-order) learners. As a main mathematical tool to prove this result, we introduce the generalised notion of second-order scoring rules.

inproceedings